PNS Ghazi Part 2

PNS GHAZI

MYSTERIOUS SINKING OF PAKISTANI SUBMARINE SOLVED (PART 2)

By  Zaheeruddin Babar

            According to Indian navy officials all was part of a plan in and intentionally a DECEPTION was created to deceive and capture PNS GHAZI. They disguised INS Rajput as INS Vikrant and sent it to Visakhapatnam, It alone created such a radio noise that PNS Ghazi took it as radio noise of Indian carrier. It means on 25th November PNS GHAZI found Vikrant although it was fake and also tried to sink it. If Indians were confident of their capability that they could easily sink Ghazi then there was no need of such DECEPTION.

       
                   Suppose If Indians had capability and war ships or submarines that could hunt Ghazi easily then why they hid their more capable ships and waited for the sinking of Ghazi. They could have easily hunt it down and implement blockade much earlier.

                    From the time Ghazi left the naval base and set out on its mission, Indians were completely aware of it. Not only this they knew the exact dates and locations of Ghazi. on 13 November, all the ships of Eastern Naval Command including INS VIKRANT set out for the Andaman and Nicobar Islands. This is the around about the same date PNS GHAZI set out on her mission. This shows an extraordinary improvement in  Indian intelligence  and it clearly indicates a foreign help.

May be Indians were right all this was to create a deception, but another kind of  deception. And it is evident from these two points.

                 If Indians were so sure about  the exact location of PNS Ghazi then all they had needed   was to arrange some warships that could destroy Ghazi. But it is evident Indians did not have that kind of war ships or capability at that time.

                   According to Indian naval sources the fake vikrant or INS Rajput reached near the whereabouts of Ghazi on 3rd of December. But the Ghazi lost communication since 25th of November. In all those days where was the Ghazi and what was it doing? And why it could not contact with naval NHQ?

                   An independent testimony stems from an Egyptian naval officer who was at that time serving on an Egyptian submarine which was undergoing refit in the harbor. He has confirmed the occurrence of a powerful explosion in the vicinity of the harbor late at night. There were no naval ships, as reported by this officer, outside the harbor at that time and it was not until about an hour after the explosion that two Indian naval ships were observed leaving harbor.

                  Note that TWO NAVAL WAR SHIPS .Indians never mentioned second ship. Also note that it was late night and it becomes difficult to identify the ship(its class nature)etc. And also note that they heard an underwater powerful explosion and there were no naval warships around at that time. It clearly indicates some under water suspicious activity happened or we can suppose the presence of a submarine. It means that at least 2 naval warships and one submarine were present there.

Were those Indian warships or submarines?

Answer is no. Because if those were their ships then there was no need to hide their involvement, and no need to destroy all records related to the event.

                Suppose Ghazi sunk due to a serious technical failure or as a result of some accident.But it is evident that Indians were preparing for this war from the last 9 or 9 months and their naval plan was to hide their entire Eastern naval fleet including INS Vikrant at Andaman and Nicobar Islands and then What?

Were they waiting for some accident? Or they had some other plan to deal with Ghazi?